Systematic review of behavioural safety interventions

Do behavioural interventions work? This 2023 systematic review evaluated the evidence.

Summary to be posted in the coming weeks.

While I’m not a proponent of behavioural approaches, I post this in response to comments on LinkedIn about how “behavioural/BBS programs don’t work”. I think to make this statement we should first look to the evidence.

Key findings included:

·        Of 19 studies, 11 suggested that behavioural interventions were effective in reducing injury/incident rates

·        Seven papers found that the interventions affected certain determinants, like safety knowledge, behaviour, attitudes, efficacy, and beliefs

·        One paper found no effect at all from the behavioural approach

·        Multifaceted interventions were more effective, as were programs tailored to individual settings/groups

·        However, “a significant amount of the articles (n = 10) reported methodological quality or quantity issues, implying that the results should be approached with caution”

Image 2 shows 1 of 4 pages of tables providing an overview of the included studies.

All the usual precaution exist – i.e. suspect stability of incident/injury data, statistical power, and generally poor quality of the research.

Ref: Bowdler, M.; Steijn,W.M.P.; van der Beek, D. Safety 2023, 9, 46.

Study link: https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9030046

Study link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/benhutchinson2_do-behavioural-interventions-work-this-2023-activity-7106409827291066368-qYru?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Leave a comment