Fatal vs non-fatal injury types found to be “measurably different”; calls for a ‘new paradigm’ in managing SIFs

This 2015 paper explored the differences between SIFs and no-SIFs – finding the underlying factors to be “measurably different”.

Summary posted soon.

They drew on data from seven multinational organisations: monthly injury data (fatal and non-fatal), comprehensive narratives for all serious injuries over the past 2 years and a sample of non-SIFs.

Key findings:

·        A Subset of Reported Incidents Will Have SIF Exposure Potential: When incident data was evaluated case-by-case, they found a percentage originally reported as nonserious contained the potential for a SIF

·        Hence, the data “clearly indicated that not all incidents had the potential to be an SIF. This logically leads to a conclusion that reducing the frequency of less-severe incidents at the bottom of the triangle does not necessarily reduce the number at the top in a proportional way”

·        Safety initiatives can be effective at lowering the number of injuries with low SIF potential, but largely ineffective for lowering high SIF potential

·        Nonserious injuries with high exposure potential in this dataset ranged from 10 to 36%, and is “organization- and location-specific, and in all cases is a subset of all reported lower severity injuries”

·        Their data indicated that “The causes and roots of SIFs and non-SIFs are measurably different”

·        42% of SIFs related to breakdowns in processes of lifesaving policies and programs, whereas 0% of non-SIFs were related to lifesaving policies

·        29% of SIFs and 17% of non-SIFs were related to routine tasks, during “which exposure changed from a planned state, was unrecognized”

·        11% of SIFs and 74% of non-SIFs were related to people factors not connected to life-saving processes

·        It’s unlikely that a SIF is a one-off, considering that the precursors leading to it have been present all along

·        Recordable injury logs are “misleading when it comes to SIF exposure”

·        The SIF blind spot in organisations is significant

Authors: Martin, D. K., & Black, A. (2015). Preventing serious injuries and fatalities: Study reveals precursors and paradigms. Professional Safety, 60(09), 35-43.

Study link: https://safetyfocus.assp.org/docs/Don%20Martin_Preventing%20Serios%20Injuries%20and%20Fatalities_September%202015.pdf

My site with more reviews: https://safety177496371.wordpress.com

LinkedIn post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/benhutchinson2_this-2015-paper-explored-the-differences-activity-7207881211354972161-MArt?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

One thought on “Fatal vs non-fatal injury types found to be “measurably different”; calls for a ‘new paradigm’ in managing SIFs

Leave a comment