Another interesting extract from James Reason below.
Jim discusses some paradoxes in safety. A paradox is “a statement contrary to received opinion; seemingly absurd though perhaps well-founded” (p3).
It’s noted that the pursuit of safety “abounds with paradox” (and likely all forms of organisational work).
I’ll post a summary of his paper in the next week or two but for now here are the paradoxes he discusses:

That is, in Reason’s view:
- health and safety is odd in that it more defines its success by the absence of safety (unsafety) rather than the presence of it.
- Little considerations are given towards how efforts to increase safety can also, sometimes, backfire.
- Excessively constraining the actions of people can also limit the agility needed to ensure safe and reliable work.
- An uncritical focus on zero harm/target zero may lead an organisation to focus on the less important issues or less attainable goals.
For a paper >20 years old, these topics would pass as current in any contemporary debate.
Source: Reason, J. (2000). Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 7(1), 3-14.

Link to the LinkedIn post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/benhutchinson2_another-interesting-extract-from-james-reason-activity-6966165645205872640-35Bn?utm_source=linkedin_share&utm_medium=member_desktop_web
Thanks Ben.
Some things don’t really change much, although hopefully new ways of safety eg safety differently, will eventually make more of an impact when in common practice.
I always enjoy your summaries Thanks Sue
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed, it’s like Groundhog day. Thank you.
LikeLike