Safety paradoxes

Another interesting extract from James Reason below.

Jim discusses some paradoxes in safety. A paradox is “a statement contrary to received opinion; seemingly absurd though perhaps well-founded” (p3).

It’s noted that the pursuit of safety “abounds with paradox” (and likely all forms of organisational work).

I’ll post a summary of his paper in the next week or two but for now here are the paradoxes he discusses:

That is, in Reason’s view:

  1.  health and safety is odd in that it more defines its success by the absence of safety (unsafety) rather than the presence of it.
  2. Little considerations are given towards how efforts to increase safety can also, sometimes, backfire.
  3. Excessively constraining the actions of people can also limit the agility needed to ensure safe and reliable work.
  4. An uncritical focus on zero harm/target zero may lead an organisation to focus on the less important issues or less attainable goals.

For a paper >20 years old, these topics would pass as current in any contemporary debate.

Source:  Reason, J. (2000). Injury Control and Safety Promotion7(1), 3-14.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is buy-me-a-coffee-3.png

Shout me a coffee

Link to the LinkedIn post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/benhutchinson2_another-interesting-extract-from-james-reason-activity-6966165645205872640-35Bn?utm_source=linkedin_share&utm_medium=member_desktop_web

3 thoughts on “Safety paradoxes

  1. Thanks Ben.

    Some things don’t really change much, although hopefully new ways of safety eg safety differently, will eventually make more of an impact when in common practice.

    I always enjoy your summaries Thanks Sue

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment