Does the absence of incidents tell you how well risks are managed?
In part 1 of our chat, Marcin Nazaruk explores why traditional ‘safety approaches’ can miss things like:
1. The normal variability in how work is performed every day
2. Constraints that limit or shape workers’ available choices
3. And error traps that make mistakes or workarounds more likely
Moreover, what looks like a ‘violation’ in hindsight might be a signal – an adaptation to a poorly designed system.
We also discuss why leaders need to move beyond simple questions like ‘Was the procedure followed?’ to exploring adaptations that help work succeed…and sometimes fail.
Please help Like, Share, Sub and Comment.
Does the absence of incidents tell you how well risks are managed?
SafetyInsights.org 