Sidney Dekker discusses whether ‘human error’ can be more of an organisational issue: how it designs and resources work, use of incentives, pressures and more.

This paper studied a ‘no blame’ approach from a HRO lens, using case studies from a few different industries. In part, they wanted to see how HRO principles translated into non-HRO industries. [** Be good if we could move beyond the ‘no blame’ language to other more suitable, less-absolute terms, e.g. restorative justice and the… Continue reading A ‘No Blame’ Approach to Organizational Learning

Did you know that there’s a gender gap in the use of AI LLMs at work? Women are less likely to use AI than men, and have more concerns about its ethical use. The study in this ep covers 18 studies, over 140,000 participants across nearly all regions, sectors and occupations.

TRIFR, SIFS and high-energy hazards, oh my. The awesome Dr Matthew Hallowell is on Safe As Q&A – NEXT WEEK. In part 1 we discuss whether there is or isn’t a link between minor potential and SIFs, better uses of injury measures, controls and error, better indicators, predictors of higher-order controls, designing-out SIFs, new view,… Continue reading Next week on Safe As: The awesome Dr Matt Hallowell talking SIFS, injury measures and more

Does dirty, sexy, money buy happiness? Unsurprisingly – yes, but only up to a threshold. Unsurprisingly – yes, but only up to a threshold. But, the authors suggest focusing on buying experiences rather than things.