Take 5, STOP, SLAM and other Last Minute Risk assessments seem like a good idea in principle, but how do they work function in practice? Not so well, according to one study. I finally summarised Havinga, Shire & Rae’s 2022 study which empirically explored the functioning of Take 5 during a trial at a major… Continue reading Do Take 5, Last Minute Risk Assessments etc. work? One study suggests not so well.
A Bottom-Up Approach to Understanding the Efficacy of Event-Analysis in Healthcare: Paradigm Shift from Safety to Resilience Engineering
This explored the perspectives of 44 healthcare workers regarding the effectiveness of RCA-based interventions/controls, using a Resilience Engineering framing to understand the realities of their everyday work. The study argues that a shortcoming of traditional event-analysis investigation is that they focus on incidents or adverse events – themselves only representing a small subset of hazardous… Continue reading A Bottom-Up Approach to Understanding the Efficacy of Event-Analysis in Healthcare: Paradigm Shift from Safety to Resilience Engineering
Does Accident Proneness exist? A meta-analysis suggests ‘Yes’
This meta-analysis analysed 79 studies to determine whether accident proneness really exists. Accident proneness is the clustering of accident-related health problems in some individuals compared to others. For instance, an earlier study from 1919 “were the first to observe that a relatively small proportion of workers in a British munitions factory had most of the… Continue reading Does Accident Proneness exist? A meta-analysis suggests ‘Yes’
The Error of Counting “Errors”
For a brief paper (two pages), this is a hard hitter. The late Bob Wears discusses some challenges with myopic focus on “error”. I’ll use a lot of direct quotes since I can’t put it any better than the author. Fundamentally, he says we can look at human error in two ways. 1. As a… Continue reading The Error of Counting “Errors”
Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review
Can’t remember if I’ve posted this already, but this open access paper systematically reviewed the literature on the efficacy of interventions in preventing work accidents, up to 2015. 100 studies met quality inclusion, representing 31 million pooled individuals in 59 interventions. They found that “Strong evidence supports greater effects being achieved with safety interventions directed… Continue reading Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review
Effective Components of Behavioural Interventions Aiming to Reduce Injury within the Workplace: A Systematic Review
This systematic review evaluated the evidence surrounding behavioural interventions in improving safety injuries and incidents. All the usual precautions about the stability of incident data remain. 19 studies met inclusion criteria. While I’m not a proponent of behavioural approaches, I post this in response to comments on LinkedIn about how “behavioural/BBS programs don’t work”. I… Continue reading Effective Components of Behavioural Interventions Aiming to Reduce Injury within the Workplace: A Systematic Review
Network resilience, communication and better actual safety performance
What is the relationship between network resilience (* capacity for) and actual project performance? A 2016 study to be posted in the coming weeks explored this relationship across three mega-projects. Overall: · Networks with better interaction and structure have higher resilience indices to risks · Higher (network) resilience indices correlated with better actual safety performance · Network structure,… Continue reading Network resilience, communication and better actual safety performance
Error counting and old ways to think about human performance
Should we count crows or errors? The late, great Bob Wears discusses some challenges with a myopic focus on “error”. Post in the next couple of weeks. He focuses on the matter in healthcare, saying that despite the push for innovation, the industry “remains trapped by old ideas [of human performance]. He says that this… Continue reading Error counting and old ways to think about human performance
Effectiveness of safety training interventions for supervisors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
This systematic review examined the effectiveness of workplace safety training interventions aimed at supervisors from 22 studies between 2000-19. Training interventions were grouped into 5 domains (expanded below). Importantly, all 22 included studies were graded as methodologically weak. Results: Overall, consistent evidence was found for the effectiveness of supervisory training interventions across several outcome measures.… Continue reading Effectiveness of safety training interventions for supervisors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
The language of conspiracy believers
One of several fascinating papers exploring the language of more radical-leaning/conspiracy communities. I suspect this topic won’t appeal to most. My prompt for reading this was an observation of similarities in language from people I’d, judgementally, considered to be more extreme-leaning. Using words like sheep/sheeple, allegedly, puppets, or putting words like scientists or research in… Continue reading The language of conspiracy believers