Influence of psychosocial safety climate on occupational health and safety: a scoping review

This scoping review evaluated the evidence surrounding how psychosocial safety climate (PSC) influences health, safety and performance of workers. 93 papers were screened from an initial sample of >13k records. Providing background: Results Key findings from this literature review were: Discussing the results, it’s said that PSC, as an “upstream job resource construct”, was found… Continue reading Influence of psychosocial safety climate on occupational health and safety: a scoping review

Construction complexity and resourcing on safety risks

How does organisational and project complexity and resourcing factors influence safety risks in construction?. I just summarised a paper that explored this; post in the next week or two. Unsurprisingly, they found that: ·        “Resources on site” is strongly determinant in explaining influences on risk variables because it affects all the risk variables in their model… Continue reading Construction complexity and resourcing on safety risks

A sensemaking model of hindsight bias

I found this an interesting paper, exploring literature around the effects of hindsight on potential learning. Hindsight bias is also known as “I knew it all along” effect. Straight off the bat, they note that “Almost universally, the nearly 600 papers that have cited Fischhoff’s seminal work in this area have claimed that hindsight is… Continue reading A sensemaking model of hindsight bias

The Role of Design Issues in Work-Related Fatal Injury in Australia

This assessed the contribution of design issues to the occurrence of fatal work-related injuries in Australia. Work-related injury data was sourced from a national coroners’ information system. 210 fatalities over the 2000-02 period were included. A limitation of this dataset is that it was not produced for the purposes of incident prevention (nor did it… Continue reading The Role of Design Issues in Work-Related Fatal Injury in Australia

The Lessons We (Don’t) Learn: Counterfactual Thinking and Organizational Accountability after a Close Call

This 2000 paper explored the role of counterfactual thinking in learning from incidents, and how organisational accountability influences learning. Two studies were used. Study 1 analysed hundreds of aviation near miss narrative events, including 89 with clear codable instances of counterfactual reasoning. Study 2 had 42 students use a flight simulator [* So, of course,… Continue reading The Lessons We (Don’t) Learn: Counterfactual Thinking and Organizational Accountability after a Close Call

Checklist design

Thought this attached guidance on developing checklists may be of interest (Of course, books, journal volumes, and careers revolve around checklist development.) For healthcare checklists, they offer image 1. Based on a previous systematic review of literature – just 7 articles out of 91 mentioned issues with the conception of a checklist. That is, asking… Continue reading Checklist design

The limits of psychological safety: Nonlinear relationships with performance

This study, across five independent protocols, explored the unintended byproducts of high levels of Psychological Safety (PS). All five protocols included multi-source data at two or more point in time – assessing a mixture of individual, team and organisational performance related to PS. The protocols included: 1. 473 knowledge employees where their in-role performance is… Continue reading The limits of psychological safety: Nonlinear relationships with performance

The ‘price of hierarchy’: how accountability can stymy learning from near accidents

I just summarised a 2000 paper on the role of counterfactual thinking on learning lessons from near accidents in aviation. Post in the next week or two. As per newer research, upward counterfactuals (imagining better alternative states, e.g. what actions could be taken in future to ensure a better outcome) compared to downward counterfactuals (imagining… Continue reading The ‘price of hierarchy’: how accountability can stymy learning from near accidents

Envisioning a team with ‘excessive psychological safety’

On the back of the new research highlighting potential “backfiring effect” (their words) of very high Psychological Safety (PS) (see link in comments), it’s interesting to look back at Amy’s work about potential boundary effects of PS. In a 2004 paper, Amy discusses several potential ways that PS may not be beneficial to team performance… Continue reading Envisioning a team with ‘excessive psychological safety’

The limits of psychological safety

Can you have too much psychological safety? This study hot off the press sought to answer this question. Summary posted soon. Over 5 separate protocols, Eldor et al. found that while moderate levels of psychological safety was associated with better in-role performance (performing standardised tasks, like most of the stuff people do in organisations each… Continue reading The limits of psychological safety