“By their nature, accidents are not directly controllable”, so says James Reason in this 1993 article. Just a single extract from the article’s conclusion: · “Safety has two faces: a positive one relating to an organization’s intrinsic resistance to chance conjunctions of unsafe acts and hazards, and a negative one, revealed by accident and incident data,… Continue reading “By their nature, accidents are not directly controllable” – James Reason, 1993
Bad apples, counterfactuals, and a focus on imagined systems – extracts from DOE accident analysis manual
REALLY cool read from the Department of Energy’s Accident Analysis Manual. Progressive and integrative of different concepts (eg. barriers, human factors, S-II, bad apples, counterfactuals). Nothing new for most, but some extracts: · They cover barrier analysis, highlighting how these questions should be upacked: o Barriers that were in place and how they performed o Barriers in place… Continue reading Bad apples, counterfactuals, and a focus on imagined systems – extracts from DOE accident analysis manual
Counteracting the Cultural Causes of Disaster
This 1999 article from Andrew Hopkins talks about the cultural factors that helped to incubate the 1994 Moura mine disaster in Australia. He starts by saying that Turner’s work demonstrated that “all socio-technical disasters involve an information or communication failure of some kind, in that they are preceded by a series of `discrepant events’ which… Continue reading Counteracting the Cultural Causes of Disaster
Issues with defining critical controls & relying on injury measures, like TRIFR – Grosvenor Board of Inquiry
More extracts from the Anglo American Grosvenor board of inquiry. This focused on issues with defining critical controls / high potential incidents (HPI), and issues relying on injury measures, like TRIFR. Extracts: · The company standard didn’t require the business unit CEO to be notified of HPIs, and “whilst it prescribes a process of escalation in… Continue reading Issues with defining critical controls & relying on injury measures, like TRIFR – Grosvenor Board of Inquiry
Compendium: Evidence For Safety Interventions (meta-analyses, systematic reviews)
Does ‘safety’ work? What is the evidence supporting the stuff we do? This mini-compendium collects several meta-analyses and systematic reviews surrounding the evidence of safety interventions on performance measures. Focus is primarily on incident/injury rather than health; nor psychosocial, safety climate & culture, HF/E, or leadership (those will be covered another time). Also haven’t focused… Continue reading Compendium: Evidence For Safety Interventions (meta-analyses, systematic reviews)
Methane events not HPIs and ventilation systems not seen as critical controls – Grosvenor Board of Inquiry
Started reading the Anglo American Grosvenor board of inquiry on the weekend. Will post some extracts over time: · Within Glencore at the time, the seriousness of the potential outcome drove which investigation and reporting level was used · A 5 point potential consequence rating, ranging from 1 (negligible) to 5 (catastrophic) was used · The inquiry notes,… Continue reading Methane events not HPIs and ventilation systems not seen as critical controls – Grosvenor Board of Inquiry
Effectiveness of Toolbox Talks as a Workplace Safety Intervention in the United States: A Scoping Review
This scoping review evaluated research on the effectiveness of toolbox talks (TBTs) as a safety intervention. Just 14 studies met inclusion. They used adult learning theory as the framework to assess the research. The following measures of effectiveness were used: Results: Following TBTs interventions: · Six studies found statistically significant improvements in workers’ safety knowledge,… Continue reading Effectiveness of Toolbox Talks as a Workplace Safety Intervention in the United States: A Scoping Review
Ed Schein talking about cultures, psychological safety, and humble inquiry.
Ed Schein talking about cultures, psychological safety, and humble inquiry (link at end of post) Extracts: · “culture [is] multidimensional– we have many cultures. We don’t just have a culture” · “if we don’t become aware of how much our thinking is culturally determined, culturally at the level of nation– you all come from different countries and different ethnicities; that’s a big… Continue reading Ed Schein talking about cultures, psychological safety, and humble inquiry.
Systems thinking, culture of reliability and safety
Fantastic read from Nick Pidgeon on how systems approaches, Turner’s MMD, sensemaking, failure and learning intersect to create or mask ‘safety’. Can’t do it justice, so just a few extracts: · “By 1990, it was clear that the .. intellectual focus was less on analysing how past accidents had occurred .. and more towards .. how… Continue reading Systems thinking, culture of reliability and safety
How complex systems (don’t) fail: YT video from late Richard Cook
A banger YT presentation from the late, great Richard Cook. He discusses ‘how complex systems fail’. Video link below. Some extracts: · “The surprise is not that there are so many accidents … The surprise is that there are so few” · “The normal world is not well-behaved … Even so, a lot of operational settings achieve… Continue reading How complex systems (don’t) fail: YT video from late Richard Cook
SafetyInsights.org 